Home | Instructional Development | Measurement & Evaluation |

 

 

 

Student Outcomes Assessment at UIUC

In 1997 a Student Outcomes Assessment Committee was appointed by the Provost to develop mechanisms for assessing student achievement in all University undergraduate and graduate programs. The UIUC system of assessment is intended to be unit-based and faculty-driven as prescribed by the committee:

While campus leadership and support is necessary, only through faculty involvement can large institutions devise effective and efficient program-based assessment plans that will produce results beneficial for all academic units. With assessment planning located primarily at the unit level, faculty can exercise their responsibility to devise appropriate methods to measure student learning. The Task Force recommends a process that gives widespread ownership of assessment planning to faculty and enables them to determine the methods and instruments that are most applicable to their educational objectives and missions. Also, the Task Force supports the idea that academic units are best suited to determine how assessment results can be used to ascertain curricular strengths and weaknesses and to improve programs.

The committee worked to help all academic units develop assessment plans for their majors and to develop assessment measures for the broader, overarching, campus-wide learning goals that are expected of all UIUC students. To help in the development of a unit assessment plan all academic departments were required to designate an assessment coordinator who received assessment training through workshops offered by the Center for Teaching Excellence.

In 2000 the Student Outcomes Assessment Committee asked units to report their assessment activities and any changes/improvements made in the units based upon their assessment results. A listing of unit activities and changes/improvements is provided below

REPORTED DEPARTMENTAL CHANGES
(65 of 74 reporting departments cited one more of the following changes)
   
Changes Number of Departments
   
Revised or revising curriculum 25
Changed courses 14
Added new course(s) 13
Changed requirements/electives 11
Added staff or faculty 11
Promoted discussion 10
Changed course sequencing 6
Improved advising 6
Added or improved annual student reviews 5
Made better use of student committees or organizations 4
Developed new learning objectives and goals 3
Improved Ph.D. qualifying exams 3
Created new data bases 2
Improved labs 2
Added capstone course 2
Added student portfolios 2
Conducted strategic planning 2
Added more placement assistance 2
Improved teaching 2
Added or improved field trips 2
Added or improved internships 2
Revised undergraduate handbook/catalog 2
Using national exams 2
Improved supervision of TAs 2
Developed exit exam 1
Added more study abroad opportunities 1
Adding senior seminar 1
Added Alumni Advisory Board 1
Added student to executive committee 1
Held faculty retreat 1

 

REPORTED DEPARTMENTAL ACTIVITIES
(63 of 74 reporting departments cited one more of the following changes)
   
Changes

Number of Departments

   
Alumni survey 26
Senior exit survey 17
Prepare for accreditation 12
Review curriculum 10
Share results with faculty 9
Undergraduate survey 9
Create better database information 8
Improve annual student reviews 7
Use ICES 6
Develop or change courses 5
Consult with student groups 4
Offer more help with job placement 4
Employer survey 4
Review Ph.D. exam results 4
Develop new degree program 4
Develop portfolio project 3
Senior testing 3
Review results on national exams 3
Use external review board 3
Improve recruitment 2
Review student grades 2

Following submission of the 2000 progress reports, the Student Outcomes Assessment Committee encouraged units to continue to implement their assessment plans but has not monitored unit activity or progress since that time. To re-emphasize the importance of continuing assessment efforts, the Provost asked all academic units in Summer, 2007, to once again identify an assessment coordinator and to revise their unit assessment plans. A series of assessment workshops will be offered for coordinators by the Center for Teaching Excellence. Units will be asked to submit a new or revised assessment plan, report on planned assessment activities, and identify changes/improvements made in recent years. The report will be due in Spring, 2008.

This site contains information on the following topics:

Unit Assessment Plans --a list of degree-granting units on campus with links to the original 1997 outcomes assessment plans.

Senior Survey--summary reports of the 1997 - 2007 Chancellor's Survey of Undergraduate Experience; these reports encapsulate the findings from online and traditional surveys conducted to measure the opinions and perceptions of graduating UIUC seniors.

Assessment Resources-- a collection of print and electronic assessment resources is provided.

Campus Assessment Workshops-- lists past and future sessions and seminars offered to assist units with the development of their respective assessment plans.

 


Last updated February 19, 2008 

 

 

  John C. Ory, Director
Center for Teaching Excellence
Room 249 Armory,  MC-528
505 E. Armory Ave.  Champaign, IL 61820
(217) 333-3370,   e-mail ory@uiuc.edu
University of Illinois

at  Urbana-Champaign