Plan to Assess and Improve Student Learning
Department of Animal Sciences
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Section I:
Process Used to Develop the Plan
Degree Programs in Animal Sciences
The Departments of Animal Science and Dairy Science were merged to form the Department
of Animal Sciences in 1985. The department offers the following degree programs:
- B.S. in Animal Sciences
- M.S. in Animal Sciences
- Ph.D. in Animal Sciences
Identification of Key Outcomes
Key outcomes were identified by the Undergraduate Courses and Curricula Committee
for the B.S. program and by the Graduate Courses and Curricula Committee and
the Graduate Study Committee for the M.S. and Ph.D. programs. The outcomes proposed
by the committees were reviewed and approved by the Department of Animal Sciences
faculty, March 12, 1999.
Section II:
Student Learning Outcomes
B.S. Program
Undergraduate programs in Animal Sciences are designed to prepare students to become
leaders in agribusiness, academe, and government. Faculty have identified the following
areas of desired competency:
- computer literacy
- effective oral and written expression
- internships and international experiences
- leadership and interpersonal skills
- problem solving and critical thinking skills
- research and/or independent study experiences
- subject matter expertise
M.S. and Ph.D. Programs
Graduate Programs are designed to provide
fundamental training in basic and applied animal sciences. After selecting an
area of specialization, students are guided by their academic advisors and Advisory
Committees in designing a program of study that will help them to develop the
knowledge and skills appropriate to the students' careers and professional objectives.
Students usually prepare for careers in basic or applied animal science research
in universities, government agencies, and private industry; college teaching;
industry, community, or public health education programs; or animal industries.
Upon completion of their graduate program, these students should be able to
read, listen and observe accurately, to question intelligently, to apply classic
and modern scientific principles to animal sciences, to be familiar with procedures
and programs currently practiced in the animal industry, to judge and interpret
data objectively, to evaluate the potential for change in the animal and biomedical
industry, and to communicate effectively.
Section III:
Methods and Measures
B.S. Program
- Methods to accomplish desired outcomes
- Subject matter expertise - The primary method of fulfilling this outcome is through the
completion of required courses in the curriculum. Those required courses include ANSCI
100, ANSCI 202; ANSCI 220, ANSCI 221; ANSCI 231; ANSCI 103, or ANSCI 200 or ANSCI 250 or
ANSCI 299; and ANSCI 298.
- Problem solving and critical thinking skills - Development of problem solving
skills will be enhanced by completing courses that require such expertise
(e.g. ANSCI 107; ANSCI 200, ANSCI 205; ANSCI 207; ANSCI 209; ANSCI 211; ANSCI
231; ANSCI 250; ANSCI 300; ANSCI 301; ANSCI 302; ANSCI 303; ANSCI 304; ANSCI
305; ANSCI 306; ANSCI 308; ANSCI 310;ANSCI 316, ANSCI 317 and ANSCI 358).
Undergraduate research projects and internship experiences will also provide
opportunities to further develop problem solving and critical thinking skills.
- Effective oral and written expression - The department offers several courses that
provide students opportunities to enhance their communication skills. Those courses that
emphasize oral communication are ANSCI 205; ANSCI 212; ANSCI 213; ANSCI 214; ANSCI 308,
and ANSCI 316, whereas ANSCI 150; ANSCI 210, and ANSCI 298 emphasize written
communication.
- Computer literacy - Undergraduates are required to complete at least one computer course
from a list that includes ACE 161, CS 101, CS 103, or CS 105. Other courses that utilize
computers and enhance computer skills include ACES 100, ANSCI 103, ANSCI 231, ANSCI 308,
ANSCI 312, ANSCI 317, ANSCI 331 and ANSCI 358.
- Leadership and interpersonal skills - Students' leadership and interpersonal skills are
developed through their participation in student and professional organizations. Many
undergraduates are members of and serve as officers of five undergraduate clubs, several
of which have affiliations with national societies such as American Society of Animal
Science. In addition, undergraduates have the opportunity to participate on five
intercollegiate judging teams and compete in local and regional quadrathalon contests.
- Measures of accomplishment of desired outcomes
Current information available to faculty and to the department include student
performance in specific courses, student response on course evaluation (ICES)
questionnaires, College of ACES Undergraduate Student Survey, senior exit interviews by
the department head, internship reports and surveys, and the chancellor's Senior Survey. A
plan to collect and evaluate all available information must be developed so we can assess
the desired outcomes accurately. Other measures that may be used include a
performance-based assessment (team projects within a course), academic student performance
in selected courses, 5-year and 10-year alumni surveys, and a standardized test
administered after the completion of a capstone course. The use of focus groups of
graduating seniors to assess their educational experience may also be considered.
M.S. and Ph.D. Programs
A. Methods to accomplish desired outcomes
- Annual review of graduate student progress
- Each student is evaluated on an annual basis. Each M.S. students advisor
reviews his/her progress and may elicit additional information from other
faculty who may have had the student in a course, or who have helped supervise
the student's research. Each Ph.D. student, in collaboration with the advisor,
selects an Advisory Committee that serves as the basis for the Preliminary
Examination Committee and the Final Examination Committee. The Advisory Committee
consists of at least four faculty members, including one from outside the
Department of Animal Sciences. The Advisory Committee provides advice to the
student and students advisor concerning course selection, progress of
the student, research, and thesis preparation when appropriate. The Advisory
Committee is appointed by the Head of the Department after considering advice
from the advisor and the student, and the committee meets initially with the
student and students advisor during the first year of the students
program. The Advisory Committee meets with the student and students
advisor annually until the completion of the degree requirements. An annual
report on the progress of the student from the advisor, with input from the
Advisory Committee, is then sent to the Graduate Program Coordinator, and
this report is included in the students departmental file. Files will
be maintained in the secretarial office of the Graduate Student Coordinator.
- M.S. Thesis Defense - Each candidate
for the Master's degree writes a thesis reporting original research. The thesis
is supervised by an academic advisor. The candidate defends the thesis in
a final oral examination, administered by the thesis advisory committee, which
concerns the thesis and other areas of animal agriculture. The thesis advisory
committee is composed of at least three members of the UIUC Graduate Faculty,
one of who serves as chair. Students must demonstrate proficiency and the
ability to draw from integrative theory and research and from different perspectives
and approaches represented in the department.
- Preliminary Exam - Ph.D. students must
pass a preliminary exam before the student is considered to be a Ph.D. Candidate.
The oral preliminary examination is a test of the students preparation
and plans for independent research. The examination includes, but is not limited
to, a formal proposal for dissertation research. The Ph.D. Preliminary Exam
should be taken before the end of the second year of the candidates
Ph.D. program and must be taken before the end of the third year of the candidates
Ph.D. program. The Preliminary Examination Committee evaluates the student's
1) general knowledge of science and animal agriculture, 2) competence in the
field of study, 3) potential for conducting creative and innovative research,
and 4) research proposal. The research proposal includes an introduction,
pertinent literature review, hypothesis and objectives, experimental design,
and procedures that are to be used. Any preliminary data that may have been
collected is presented.
- Enhancement of oral communication skills
- Students are provided numerous opportunities to develop speaking skills
through group meetings, divisional seminar programs, the Neumann Graduate
Student Paper competition, and research presentations at regional, national
and international meetings.
- Biennial survey or focus groups with
current students - Surveys or focus groups of current graduate students will
be conducted biennially to assess (1) students' satisfaction with the quality
of instruction and the availability of formal and informal opportunities to
develop the desired competencies; and (2) students' appraisal of the quality
of instruction and advising during their time in the department. Surveys will
ask respondents to identify sources of strengths, limitations, and suggestions
for improvements. Procedures to be used for surveys and focus groups are under
development and will be tested with two different groups of students in Fall
1999, with implementation estimated for Spring 2000.
- Student participation in graduate policy
committees - The Graduate Study Committee includes a graduate student elected
by the graduate students to represent the views and concerns of the graduate
student body. Students have an opportunity, through their representative;
to provide feedback on required competencies, assessment methods, and departmental
efforts to develop these competencies in students.
- Consultation with the External Advisory
Committee - Competencies will be reviewed by selected members of the External
Advisory Committee (i.e., those members who represent disciplinary competencies
of areas in the department) for appropriateness and applicability.
B. Measures of accomplishment of desired
outcomes
The Department of Animal Sciences Graduate
Program will use various forms of currently available information to assess
outcomes including, but not limited to, student performance in specific courses,
student response on course evaluating (ICES), time-to-degree completion, and
successful completion of the preliminary and final exams. The Graduate College
Review and Improvement Committee will provide information related to grades
in key courses, publication of thesis research, Graduate College surveys and
comments during exit interviews with the department head. A series of standard
questions is being developed to use in advance of the exit interview by the
department head. Students will be asked to answer these questions at the time
they deposit their thesis or at the time of their exit interview, whichever
comes first. Information from these sources will be evaluated by the Graduate
Teaching Coordinator, the Graduate Courses and Curricula and Graduate Study
Committees. The use of focus groups is under development.
Section IV:
Plans to Use Results for Program Improvement
The Undergraduate and Graduate Teaching Coordinators will manage the outcomes
assessment process in Animal Sciences with input from the Undergraduate and
Graduate Courses and Curricula Committees and the Graduate Study Committee.
The two coordinators will be responsible for collection, evaluation and summation
of undergraduate and graduate data each year. The appropriate Courses and Curricula
Committees as well as the faculty and the External Advisory committee will review
annual reports. Recommendations for curriculum modification will be considered
and implemented when deemed appropriate and career enhancing.
Section V.
Timeline for Implementation
Fall 1998 - Spring 1999
- develop process to monitor graduate and undergraduate student grades in selected
courses; collect data
- assess adequacy of exit interviews and written surveys
Summer 1999
- collect data from student exit interviews and written surveys
- tabulate and interpret data on student grades
Fall 1999
- develop process for focus groups of undergraduate students and faculty
- consult with the External Advisory committee
- present outcomes assessment report to faculty
Spring 2000
- initiate necessary changes in exit interview processes and surveys
Summer 2000
- tabulate and interpret ICES core data
- tabulate and interpret second-year data on student grades
- prepare second outcomes assessment report
Fall 2000
- Present outcomes assessment report to faculty and External Advisory committee
Section VI:
Resources and Support Needed
The outcomes assessment plan may require additional staff or student assistance to
collect and tabulate data from various sources, and may require assistance in design and
implementation of focus groups and surveys. We do not currently anticipate a need for any
other additional resources.
Date revised: June 1, 1999